You sometimes see headlines like this, and I don’t like them:
Even though I know where the story is going, that it will be about predatory behaviour by the gambling industry (an industry that’s easy to hate, unless it’s horse racing because rich white people like horse racing), the connotation here is this: Māori and Pasifika are weak. They are prey to capitalism’s predation.
It’s why I don’t like scholarship categories like this one:
I know that this is about equity, but it reads poorly. Being Māori puts you in the same pool as refugees and the disabled. Being tangata whenua and seeing that might make you flinch a little. There is a truth to this: in the Pākehā hegemony Māori are probably quite likely to feel like refugees and to be treated as if their background is a disability, but I don’t think the pitch for this scholarship is satirical.
Or how about this then:
Didn’t John McCain bring us Sarah Palin? Didn’t he vote with Trump 83% of the time? Wasn’t he a warmonger who dropped bombs on civilians in North Vietnam? John McCain is not a man I admire in the slightest. He fits into the adulation people give Obama though. There’s a sort of calm reasonableness and an avuncular charm to them. Let’s remember Obama’s drone programme and ratcheting up of the surveillance state. And let’s remember McCain calling protesters “despicable low lifes” for questioning why anyone would want advice from Henry Kissinger on whether invading Iraq was a good idea.
The most “best” thing about Trump is that the venality is now out in the open. The previous decades have seen disguised appalling American behaviour. Now we can just dispense with the phony concern for human rights and cut to the chase: America acts in its own interests, and will never hold itself accountable for anything. Under cover of Coca Cola and Nicki Minaj they get to sell weapons around the world, drone bomb and kill whoever they want, cosy up to Netanyahu, cut aid to Palestine, murder Black people, separate families, limit birth control and abortion…. It’s a long list. One that goes back as long as you care to count. It’s just that the rhetoric has changed now from “democracy, human rights, yadda, yadda, yadda” to “America first”.
Which presents a great opportunity for the world to go, “sweet, we’ll take it from here”, and form a better alliance of peers to try and look at the world’s issues.
Yeah, I know. Like that will happen.
At least we can not participate in that other narrative. If you do you might occasionally say something like “hmmm, Trump sort of has a point”. That’s ok. Firstly, it happens very, very rarely, and secondly the media really can be as lazy as hell. The mainstream media often is kind of shit. Let’s be honest. Just look back at the coverage of McCain’s funeral even in this country. What do we hear about Yemen in New Zealand?
Then we have Trump on the deaths of white farmers in South Africa. The media – whose default is to mock everything he says – has gone with “murders of white farmers are at a twenty year low dumb dumb” as a riposte. To which I think most people should say, “wait, what?” It’s not good. You know, people getting murdered. It feels like an awfully complex problem in which white people owning all the farm land is not good and NEITHER IS MURDERING THEM. Lazy media response: “Trump said something dumb”. Hey, I get it, he’s an ignorant, arrogant man, but don’t minimise the complexity and tragedy of that problem in South Africa. Everything in the world is not a one liner to put that man down.
I say all this having made a resolution not to click on any news that has Trump in the title. A resolution I have kept 95% of the time. Even keeping it 95% of the time I feel like I know exactly what this nasty little man is doing. It reminds me of when John Key came to power in New Zealand and Labour and much of the media focused on how he was a dick ignoring the fact that he was tremendously popular and would still be PM if he had wanted to be. Stop talking about the guy. FFS. Talking is oxygen.
Most of the problems of the world are easily run off in a list. None of them are about the pet leader someone hates. It’s something like climate change, inequality, oppression, the unpicking of life, love and wisdom by social media, the way that capitalism is the root of all those things and makes even the people at the top unhappy, anxious and sick. Neo-liberalism doesn’t want you to think about any of this. Neo-liberalism’s concern is efficient capitalism where people are units in a profit and loss equation. Neo-liberalism’s concern is that the local university needs to rebrand itself to differentiate itself in a competitive global marketplace.
Grant Guilford is the vice-chancellor of VICTORIA University. The one people have gone to for 100 years, and was founded and named in the time of Queen Victoria. University of Wellington? There are 39 places in the world called Wellington. Never mind. Neo-liberalism does not care for a name of a time and a place: of history. If he wanted to just switch the Māori name to the title, and the English name to the subtitle he might have my interest. I wouldn’t mind being of Te Whare Wāngana o te Ūpoko o te Ika a Māui. That would truly be a tūrangawaewae in the world. But no. Wellington. The Duke of Wellington. A man who never came to this country. So we switch from one imperialist name to another for the purpose of being distinct. Neo-liberalism has many features and one is a lack of irony.
No. The headline wants you to go: “Obama was so great” or “Trump is a dick”. Don’t do it. Don’t click. Go read a poem. Go look at the rain. Go help a friend. Or a stranger.